|
|
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) |
| Line 5: |
Line 5: |
| | | | |
| | __TOC__ | | __TOC__ |
| | + | |
| | + | =Welcome!= |
| | + | |
| | + | Welcome to the homepage of BcWs. If you are new to the team, it's advised to first check out http://wiki.2value.nl/Kantoor_A-lab/EN which will explain the basic rules around A-Lab and BcWs. |
| | | | |
| | ==Blockchain Lab== | | ==Blockchain Lab== |
| Line 18: |
Line 22: |
| | :PR plus speaker slots and sidekick positions during meetups are possible. | | :PR plus speaker slots and sidekick positions during meetups are possible. |
| | | | |
| − | =Positive critical and constructive=
| + | [[Stand-up Internal]] |
| − | | |
| − | ==Abstract==
| |
| − | A Weekly session in Blockchain-lab (lab004) in A-lab Amsterdam.
| |
| − | Tuesday morning 10:00 AM 'Who dares?!'
| |
| − | | |
| − | An outsider comes to A-lab to present and discuss his or hers blockchain-approach. The available group of blockchain-lab expert question the presenter critically. And they offer their recommendations afterwards.
| |
| − | | |
| − | The goal is networking, quality improvement of ideas (the lab function!), etc
| |
| − | | |
| − | It is free, without payment!
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==What's in it for...==
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===...the speaker - ambassador from outside===
| |
| − | :Test plans in a safe trusted (explicitly non disclosed)environment.
| |
| − | :Access to a team of specialists
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===...the associate and member of Blockchain-lab===
| |
| − | :The lab-function: learn how to interview and audit a third party plan
| |
| − | :The team function: learn about the specific expertise of other Blockchain-lab members and associates
| |
| − | :The pre-sales function: a speaker might be impressed by what the team and certain individuals have to say and how they say it
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===...the blockchain-lab===
| |
| − | :Blockchain-lab builds culture through the session with third parties, discussing their business cases. The lab function consists of learning how the ask questions, how to intervene in a clear but diplomatic way, etc.
| |
| − | :Via these sessions the professional network of blockchain-lab grows.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===...outsiders===
| |
| − | Outsiders can read the meeting minutes. Only A-lab blockchain-lab member are privileged to attend the session.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==How it is done==
| |
| − | Apart from a standardised preparation and work done in various roles and responsibilities the actual session is a pretty clean cut:
| |
| − | :1. Room is sufficiently filled with prepared blockchain-experts and or experts on the topic of the presentation. Camera running if possible, Decision made about social media activity, someone or two people make notes, etc.
| |
| − | :2. Presenter makes his or her plea, the status of the information exchanged is clear upfront/ Either disclosable or not. Expertise added from the expert-forum present is always open source (CC by SA) - max 15 minutes.
| |
| − | :3. 'Why don't you use a database - phase'. "Grill, skin and fillet." - max. 30 minutes
| |
| − | :4. Conclusions, next steps, advice, name dropping, url-flipping - max 15 minutes
| |
| − | :5. After exactly 1 hrs the meeting is done and just half an hour later the writers of the recommendation finalize their words.
| |
| − | | |
| − | | |
| − | ==What is said and not said==
| |
| − | The meeting is behind closed doors. Associates and members of Blockchain-lab have committed themselves to a non-disclosure to offer a trusted environment for the presenter to fully speak out about plans and their challenges in an early stage of developments.
| |
| − | | |
| − | But of course we would like to be able to speak out in the open about subjects and topics so speaker that allow this, will get preference.
| |
| − | | |
| − | =The standard letters=
| |
| − | ==Invitation_selection 'Bake Off'==
| |
| − | | |
| − | Dear ...,
| |
| − | | |
| − | At blockchain-lab we have a weekly session with people from outside our organisation on Tuesday mornings. Our goal is to test and strengthen ideas. Those ideas could be an approach that you have in your own organization to bring the blockchain innovation under the attention of your colleagues, a design of a product or service, either targeted internally of at customers.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Our question is simple: would you mind to come and perform for us one time? If so, would Tuesday ... or Tuesday .... fit your agenda?
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Request for proposal==
| |
| − | | |
| − | The content of the 15 minutes presentation is very crucial for the rest of the session:
| |
| − | :1. It needs to have '''substance''' for the experts in the room, but the introduction in text has to be '''brief''' (Make an abstract)
| |
| − | :2. It must be an open discussion. If a presenter were to withhold crucial information for the group of experts, the latter might be not taken seriously and respected for their free advice and/or assessment. Dare to put yourself in a vulnerable position. It is safe.
| |
| − | :3. Please send in the questions you have that you would like to have answered or given a view on by the group of experts.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Planning==
| |
| − | ===Decision===
| |
| − | ...to move forward with a specific session, done blockchain-lab
| |
| − | :2 weeks upfront
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===Invite===
| |
| − | ...the associates & members of blockchain-lab invite via a closed group in the meetup group.
| |
| − | :2 weeks upfront invitation
| |
| − | :1 week upfront confirmations who will attend
| |
| − | | |
| − | ===Marketing & PR===
| |
| − | Say what can be said about the session in public soc. media channels, Anyhow: we keep the details of the session private and vaguely communicatie that the session will take place and its stakeholders. If it needs to be hidden / private we respect that wish.
| |
| − | :1 week upfront
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Tuning content==
| |
| − | :2 days upfront
| |
| − | :Is there any preliminary reading to do (should not be counted on that it will be done)?
| |
| − | :Are there any comparisons to make to other developments elsewhere?
| |
| − | :O Check interactivity of the presentation
| |
| − | :O Check openness of the topic
| |
| − | :O Check questions for the audience
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Recommendation==
| |
| − | :24 hrs after the session in concept sent to the presenter
| |
| − | :48 hrs after the session confirmed / edited by the presenter
| |
| | | | |
| − | ==Follow-up==
| + | [[Blockbooster]] |
| − | ===Marketing & PR===
| |
| − | Say what can be said about the session in public soc. media channels
| |
| − | :the latest 1 week after the session
| |
